ISIS captures Santa

Merry Christmas, infidels!

white privilege

I posted that meme in a Facebook group for political debate with the following comment: "including the self-loathing, race baiters who indulge in ethnic treason."

As usual, one of the self-loathing white traitors took issue with it and a slinging match ensued.

However, the best comment was so good that I've got permission from its author to copy and post it here verbatim:

There are so many problems with privilege theory but the obvious ones are blatant hypocrisy, circularity and targeting the wrong causes. Ultimately privilege theory is basically intellectualized envy. Do black people aspire to the wealth they associate with white people? Of course they do. Do women aspire to the benefits that they associate with being male? Of course they do. Why demonize what you aspire too? There is nothing wrong with aspiration or ambition but there is something wrong with demonizing the very people you aspire to emulate. For envy to retain some positive quality you have to retain the ability to identify with those you wish to emulate, so hate doesn't corrode your ethics. If you choose to live a life similar to someone you envy you should choose to act more like them as opposed to inventing a false narrative which reinvents their success as a type of appropriation which you will in turn use to justify appropriating that which is rightfully theirs.

Privilege theory correctly divides the world between those who have and those who do not and I have no issue with this provided it remains on an individual level and that you retain some respect for those individuals who have been more successful than you. The problem with privilege theory is it takes a useful idea too far in that it turns successful individuals into an evil collective, a collective which is then demonized in an attempt to both deny the successful the fruits of their success and to shield the less successful from a searching self-examination.

Are there structural inequalities and bigotries in the world? Of course there are. Can these structural inequalities alone be a sufficient explanation into why some individuals fail and why others succeed? Of course not. They are only a small part of the broader explanation. This is a major flaw in all collectivist theories; they go too far and almost exclusively focus on blaming external factors (demonized groups) instead of a broader more balanced answers. The fact is that by focusing on collective identities such as gender, race and color, greater problems are both obscured and facilitated. Successful individuals are willing to live (legitimately and illegitimately) at the expense of other people and unsuccessful individuals are willing to do exactly the same thing. The question then becomes who is behaving ethically and this is almost always correctly answered on the individual level. This is true with all of the collectivist (socialist) theories, which “White Privilege Theory” is definitely part of.

Another part of privilege theory which is just wrong is how it completely misrepresents what privilege is. Privilege theory reduces the whole concept of privilege into a type of unearned advantage, gained via a corrupt law or group consensus, but this is just doesn't hold up to an honest examination of the facts. Elite individuals may have privilege but whole groups don’t and elitism is not exclusive to any of the groups mentioned by privilege theory. Elites come all all races, colors and genders. Collectivist’s love simplistic umbrella concepts as it renders them simple mantras which in turn facilitates the recruiting of the gullible. This is the essence of a thought virus. There are no deserving individuals for collectivists other than the elite who spread the collectivist truth. Everyone is either privileged or oppressed; ergo those who are not oppressed are privileged; circular insanity. They are not legitimately part of the status quo, they are not hard working people who deserve the fruits of the labor, they are the privileged. Currently we live with this insanity which has resulted in government policies which have decreed that all non-oppressed people (those who enjoy the status quo) are in fact privileged and should be oppressed as punishment for this privilege. We are establishing special laws and bureaucracies to find non-oppressed (privileged) people and oversee their oppression.

Academics, bureaucrats and opportunistic pseudo-progressive politicians continually repeat mantras which justify this new discrimination which results in oppressing the non-oppressed. Oppression increases and the status quo is threatened but wealth and opportunity is not increased. Soon the non-oppressed themselves begin to think of themselves as having an illegitimate type of privilege; the ability to avoid oppression. The actual content of this privilege is of course negative in nature as it’s the privilege of not having been oppressed, of not being hungry or of not being tortured by the ruling elite. Most oppression comes from elite individuals misusing the state’s monopoly on violence, but privilege theorists believe that state violence is the solution if targeted on those who had been successful in avoiding this type of violence up to this point. To speak of such a privilege is a circular insanity. Torture, hunger and oppression are bad but if you manage to avoid them you become a privileged oppressor and must be exposed to these very same bad things. This institutionalizes powerlessness, as when confronted by overwhelming force, the best most individuals can do is to hide, avoid and develop an asset base which enables you to get better at this in the future.

Privilege theory says that this avoidance and collection of capital makes the individual guilty. Privilege theory imposes on those who successfully avoid oppression and collect capital a penalty; extra oppression. This is the futility of privilege theory, it fights injustice with extra injustice aimed at those who are successful at avoiding the initial injustice and attempts to disguise the origin of the injustice; the state.

Privilege theory is also a type of binary fallacy. Women v men, black v white, gay v straight, Muslims vs. Christians, majority v minority etc. There is a very deliberate reason for this too and that is by focusing on human constants, elements that cannot change due to biological reason or things which resist change due to cultural reasons, privilege theory itself is cemented. This is also why collectivists hate capitalism so much as if an individual gains capital and you gain upward social mobility, lose capital and you rejoin the desperate. Capital is blind to the groups which collectivists abuse to cement their authority and capital resists the collectivists attempts to make humanity an unchanging solid. Privilege theorists want to preserve existing identity yet most people wish to escape it.

Another flaw with privilege theory is that it states that the privileged rarely notice their privilege. The flaw is not with successful individuals, but with the theory. Where white people are a majority, the western world, they don’t notice their advantages for the same reason the Chinese don’t notice Chinese privilege in China etc. Being part of the status quo is not a privilege, it is a cultural norm. Cultures all have dominant groups and this is not itself a negative. Privilege theorists which to elevate minority groups above majority groups and being treated better than the status quo is the only true definition of privilege I can see.

This is the final absurdity of privilege theory, it wants to bestow privilege to counter the status quo while claiming privilege is wrong. If you retain the ability to identify with the successful within your community as opposed to demonizing them, you can see that they may have rights that you aspire too. They are not privileged and you oppressed. They are to be emulated not defeated and this continues to be the winning argument in my opinion; rights can be earned via individual effort and the ability to avoid the excesses of the state.

kill straight white men

While the world gets hysterical about Ferguson and the 16 days campaign, the abuse of straight white men goes on unabated with virtually no media attention and certainly no rioting.

The racial abuse of white people is starting to get more media coverage but it pales into insignificance compared to to reporting the other way.

Violence against women by men is at epidemic proportions according to all the feminist propaganda being spouted by not only the media but the lies go right to the top with #HeForShe and UN Women. The facts tell a very different story of violence and crime in general being in general decline and at very low levels in the Western world; and domestic violence against women being at their lowest levels since the 1970s, and probably since records began because prior to the seventies, women rarely reported DV.

Everybody is a victim, even those who don't know it or who don't want to be, and all those victims can blame their problems and behaviour on straight white men.

While you're wallowing in victimhood, consider how different your world would be without white men; look at all the science and technology around you and do a quick internet search on who invented all this stuff. I dread a world without white men because we'd be stuck in the stone age with savages and philistines.

no girls allowed

tax is theft

listen to ‘Tax is theft’ on audioBoom

Discrimination against men

"Gender discrimination against men in our society does exist and we see it in multiple forms."

A great video report from Australia about misandry.

My only criticism of this report is the statistical claim which has no gender comparison and is very limited in its contextual validity, otherwise it's excellent and as we all know, very true.

Link to this video on YouTube: http://youtu.be/3fL9RmVtMP0

We live in an age of hysteria and paranoia. Men are seen as a danger towards women and children, including their own families. Such a notion, for whatever reasons it has come about, must stop; not only because of injustice but also because of the damage we are doing to our society.

10 Hours of Princess Leia Walking in NYC

A great spoof of the notorious feminist propaganda video.

Link to this video on YouTube: http://youtu.be/7DCDYSJwwE4

Ex-feminist destroys a feminist propaganda video

Link to the video on YouTube: http://youtu.be/YuaB2CTw6yY

Ex-feminist Kristal Garcia rebuts a feminist propaganda video that attacks #WomenAgainstFeminism.

LGBT rights & abuse

When does equality actually mean privilege? When is equality inappropriate because it is harmful to someone or detrimental to society?

Allowing LGBTs to be parents is child abuse. Nature decides who can be parents through an act of copulation between a male and a female; a child conceived and parented any other way is unnatural and in some cases, immoral. Furthermore and for humans, a child should only be conceived through an act of love by a couple cohabiting in union or betrothed to do so.

We don't need religion or science to tell us that is right but it has indeed proven to be best for children and society. Successful societies are those which value the family as nature intended: a nurturing homemaking woman fulfilling the role of wife and mother; a man fulfilling the role of husband and father who works hard to provide for and protect his family; both parents educate and lead by example; they are the role models for their children who must follow in the parents' footsteps for a sustainable healthy society.

Obviously, not every child has the luxury of both biological parents for a variety of reasons but the best alternative solution must be found, which should be the closest possible match to the biological parents. Said match must never be LGBTs or those of a different ethnic group or culture.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2821113/Custody-battle-gay-parents-wrecked-childhoods-2-girls-says-judge.html

When societies become so morally corrupt that such a case as the one in the link above can even exist, we become despised and make enemies, not only abroad but within, as decent folks are pushed to extremes as an equal and opposite reaction to the societally destructive onslaught of liberal extremism.

I'm all for live and let live, but live and let breed is another issue that needs to be kept in check if it abuses children. LGBTs and those with hereditary diseases or disabilities have no moral right to procreate. We already have enough disadvantaged children struggling for survival or dependent on the nanny state so by allowing the seriously-genetically flawed to produce offspring, we are deliberately bringing children into a life of suffering and creating a sicker society.

The consensus of scientific opinion on the cause of LGBT is an abnormality occurring in the womb and not a lifestyle choice as is so often proclaimed; the gay rights group Stonewall accepts this official explanation and rightly uses it as an argument against homophobia; nobody should be persecuted for an accident of birth. However, LGBTs should recognise their defect and accept they aren't suitable for parenthood.

Children are born innocent and their early years are dependent on whomever takes care of them; being adopted or born by LGBTs is psychologically damaging for their malleable and impressionable young minds. Such cases as the story in the link below are so abhorrent that heads should roll.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2043345/The-California-boy-11-undergoing-hormone-blocking-treatment.html

That story tells of such wicked child abuse that the only the death penalty would suffice. Sadly, the "parents" and their partners in crimes against humanity are apparently within their rights; rights which should not exist; rights which give them the privilege of committing the inhumane and criminal act of child abuse without recourse.

Various LGBT groups have been vying for rights and promoting their agendas so aggressively that many have been taken in by the propaganda, and the silent majority has been duped into giving them not just equality but privilege. Like with so many rights groups, they package privilege as progress and equality, initially demonising voices of reason as bigots but ultimately lobbying government to criminalise criticism, then true human rights are denied such as freedom of speech; debate is shutdown and we become subject to authoritarianism and oppression, which foments resentment, hatred and extremism; the very reasons rights groups formed to lobby against.

Lena Dunham child abuse

False-rape accuser and feminist-bandwagon riding Lena Dunham has stooped to new lows with confessions of sexually molesting her little sister. She then writes about it and obviously hopes to profit from it.

Whether we dismiss the actual act itself as childish curiosity or not is less of an issue as the lurid nature of the revelations.

Read it here on Truth Revolt:
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/lena-dunham-describes-sexually-abusing-her-toddler-sister

After the predictable ensuing furore, she defends herself publicly with Gawker describing the child abuse accusations as right-wing. Read it here:
http://gawker.com/lena-dunham-responds-to-right-wing-claim-of-sibling-se-1653637030

The feminist empowerment of women, whether intentional or not, is a convenient shield for narcissists and sociopaths who paraphrase feminist rhetoric and mantras in defence of immoral actions and relinquishment of responsibilities.

anti-feminist meme

That's one of the best anti-feminism memes I've ever seen and I'm proud to say I contributed to its creation. The meme was made by a friend of mine who is an academic specialising in law and gender studies. My contribution was to dumb down the language while keeping it succinct.

Within hours of posting this meme online, it went viral; that clearly says a lot.

The war on men & child support in the USA

The outrageous injustices that men suffer is tantamount to a war on men. Here are some cases of men being unfairly ordered to pay child support in the USA.

The child support system is draconian and biased in many countries, and combined with discriminatory family law it undeniably contributes to a war on men.

A man must pay $30,000 in child support for a child that isn't his or he'll be jailed:
http://www.wxyz.com/news/region/detroit/detroit-man-fights-30k-child-support-bill-for-kid-that-is-not-his

A man is jailed for paying child support a little late despite paying too much:
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/story/24514990/father-gets-6-months-in-jail-for-paying-child-support-late

A statutory rape victim must pay $15,000 in child support:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/05/nick-olivas-alleged-rape-victim-_n_5773532.html

Welcome to the nanny state

Welcome to the nanny state: A fatherless society and a breeding ground for lazy chav scum. The working and middle classes are sandwiched between two parasitical classes: the ruling class and the underclass. Both are feeding off us and unless we wake up from our coma of apathy, our blood will be sucked dry, we'll capitulate and that'll be the end of our civilisation.

Of course, not everyone who is dependent on benefits is a lowlife or anything akin to the adult in the picture. Indeed, welfare can really help those in desperate need and I wouldn't resent the charitable support of a decent honest person who has fallen on bad times. The problem is the system is flawed, it's being abused and it's costing hard-working tax payers a fortune.

Young kids exploited by feminists

Potty-Mouthed Princesses Drop F-Bombs for Feminism by FCKH8.com on Vimeo.

The video is shocking and that's the intention. However, such feminist filth is preaching to the converted as decent folks of morality and integrity will obviously condemn such a video and certainly won't be persuaded to adopt such a toxic ideology.

Below is the comment I left on the original video page:

It's wicked child abuse. Not only have you exploited young children for a cheap trick and political gain, but you're indoctrinating them into a toxic ideology of lies and hate. Feminism is the cult of the matriarchy with a hierarchy much more real and sinister than the fabled patriarchy. Throwing tantrums over your petty first world problems is beyond selfish and irresponsible; it's reckless, especially when brainwashing children. Rather than perpetuate antiquated beliefs in female oppression, all of which are now dispelled myths, why not take responsibility for your life instead of blaming your problems on half the population, most of whom are kindhearted and chivalrous.

Feminism is as the word suggests not about equality but about women; it seeks female privilege; the name says it all; it's no brainer.

How about being a decent honest person and helping your fellow human without gender politics or any kind of identity politics?

rape culture insanity

There seems to be a lot of insanity and hysteria surrounding campus rape in the USA recently. In the Western world and beyond, there is also a much more widely propagated notion of rape culture, no doubt emanating from feminism. This reckless propaganda is not only an attack on men and male sexuality but damaging for society in general.

This feminist-fed rape culture propaganda doesn't protect and empower women as it suggests; it creates hysteria and paranoia, and perpetuates an already epidemic litigation and victim culture. Young men become too scared to develop normal relationships with women at the most important time of their sexual development. Young males are making the final transition from boy to man, away from their parents' prying eyes; their hormones are raging and they're surrounded by accessible young women, who are not, as feminists preach, innocent victims; they want it too because much the same goes for young women as for young men.

We need to stay out of their party life. Yes, we need to be responsible parents, teachers and guardians and warn them of the dangers, ask them to take precautions and look out for trouble, but let the kids party because these are the best years of their lives. Waking up with a hangover after a wild party of sex and drugs and rock n roll is a rite of passage; if a young woman regrets any of it, that's not a crime; it's just part of growing up.

The ever-broadening definition of rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment is irresponsible, reckless and insane. We've reached a point now, and it's a very low point in our societal development, whereby a woman can accuse a man of rape and ruin his life on a whim. Men are guilty until proven innocent which is extremely unjust and unethical. It appears that the old radical feminist mantra of all men being rapists has finally come true by moving the parameters to such an extent that it's a catch-all; and that goes for sexual assault and sexual harassment too.

A woman regretting a sexual encounter has no moral case for accusations but tragically for society, she now has legal recourse. We live in dangerous times; not for women but for men. A man is now extremely wary of all interaction with women; he has already suffered the indignation of paedophile hysteria, which sees him as a sexual predatory threat to all children including his own, and now he's a threat to all women. So are they empowered?

No, women are not empowered by the gaping dragnets of draconian laws; they are unwitting victims. At least men are aware of the dangers though powerless to resist through fear of losing it all, such as career, family and liberty. Women are being conditioned to fear and distrust men; they are losing their ability to distinguish the genuine advances of a potential mate from potential danger. Women run the risk of either being lonely and frustrated through lack of male attention, and have far fewer opportunities to enjoy romance, courtship and the path to a permanent relationship.

Our civilisation is approaching something akin to moral totalitarianism whereby we are restricted to patterns of behaviour defined by the nanny state and its lobbyists, who include an unhealthy amount of leftist academics afflicted by the Ivory Tower Syndrome. Such moral authoritarianism will inevitably lead to feelings of oppression and thoughts of rebellion by the population at large; human sexuality is immensely powerful and suppressing it with social engineering will inevitably lead to serious problems.

I hope we are at the lowest point and there can be a revival of common sense. I look forward to seeing the social engineers hanged from their ivory towers along with their partners in crimes against humanity from the nanny state.

The nanny state, part 2

listen to ‘The nanny state, part 2’ on audioBoom

Women's Suffrage Addendum

Genius! This woman destroys feminist theory in a video under 3 minutes.

Link to the video on YouTube: http://youtu.be/_dZ4c2ei2I4

Feminism is hate.

Government and the nanny state, part 1

listen to ‘Government & the nanny state, part 1’ on audioBoom

Patriarchy

Ray Rice and the double standard

I'd never heard of Ray Rice until this week and I'm not interested in American football but I am interested in injustice and righting wrongs.

You can read about the Ray Rice affair from British leftist newspaper The Guardian here:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/08/ray-rice-domestic-violence-video-janay-palmer-victim-blaming

Here is my opinion piece on the matter in audio form:

listen to ‘Ray Rice and the double standard’ on Audioboo



External ink to the audio recording:

https://audioboo.fm/boos/2471465-ray-rice-and-the-double-standard

Religion

Bollocks to the UK's draconian laws that forbid criticising religion. We all have a right to mock retarded creeds and the fuckwits that practise savage rituals. Credit to Rowan Atkinson for speaking out against the government o this issue.

False Rape: Rhiannon Brooker

False rape is a problem of epic proportions. Women have been ruining men's lives with false accusations of rapes for years. Feminism plays its filthy role in perpetuating the myth of all men being (potential) rapists. Even after acquittal, men are often unable to lead a normal life; one reason being that mud sticks.

I'm glad to see more stories of false rape claims being reported and hope the tide is turning against such evil women. Here is a case from Britain as reported in a popular daily newspaper:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/law-graduate-who-falsely-accused-3768882

It should be noted that the newspaper is left-wing and feminist.

Highlights from the story include:

• an innocent man held in custody for 36 days
• the innocent man was abused in prison
• the bitch feigned injuries
• the bitch claimed she suffered a miscarriage from the man's violence

The evil bitch in question has ruined two lives: not only that of the falsely-accused but also her baby's. Her barrister described the case as "unique and tragic".

It's definitely "tragic" but not "unique".

Until false-accusers get the same punishment as the falsely-accused face, including aggravating factors, there will be no chance of such cases being unique.

FIFA corruption

A great political and topical picture. Credit to Alex Fuller aka Arfling for this creation.

Why Do Men Sexualize EVERYTHING?!

Excellent video.



I left the following comment on this video on YouTube:

Absolutely superb. I prostrate myself before you in reverence. You have such an acute understanding of human behaviour and modern culture. You eloquently and succinctly convey an accurate message about a very serious societal problem, while maintaining a great sense of humour. Awesome.

Link to this video on YouTube: http://youtu.be/aJ6YpUk0TyQ

Trigger warning fo' you b*tches!

Great video message and justifiable rant about trigger warnings, the latest assault on freedom.



Link to this video on YouTube: http://youtu.be/IuRx4ccb0ac

I left the following comment under this video on YouTube:

Superb, thank you. To pick up on a point you made about "in the real world", we're up against people who want to change the real world into their utopian world view. Such people are seemingly privileged extreme left-wing academics who are self-righteous and authoritarian, and perhaps synonymous with the "radical social justice community" whom you mention.

Stop wanking by Jehovah's Witness & 50 Cent

How about a rap song by 50 Cent dubbed over a video of Jehovah's Witnesses using sign language to preach the bible to deaf people to persuade them not to masturbate?

Link to this video on YouTube: http://youtu.be/QReUbe4kp-o

tea & harmony

So Dalai, call me cynical but isn't it just ordinary tea with a poncy name?