LGBT rights & abuse

When does equality actually mean privilege? When is equality inappropriate because it is harmful to someone or detrimental to society?

Allowing LGBTs to be parents is child abuse. Nature decides who can be parents through an act of copulation between a male and a female; a child conceived and parented any other way is unnatural and in some cases, immoral. Furthermore and for humans, a child should only be conceived through an act of love by a couple cohabiting in union or betrothed to do so.

We don't need religion or science to tell us that is right but it has indeed proven to be best for children and society. Successful societies are those which value the family as nature intended: a nurturing homemaking woman fulfilling the role of wife and mother; a man fulfilling the role of husband and father who works hard to provide for and protect his family; both parents educate and lead by example; they are the role models for their children who must follow in the parents' footsteps for a sustainable healthy society.

Obviously, not every child has the luxury of both biological parents for a variety of reasons but the best alternative solution must be found, which should be the closest possible match to the biological parents. Said match must never be LGBTs or those of a different ethnic group or culture.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2821113/Custody-battle-gay-parents-wrecked-childhoods-2-girls-says-judge.html

When societies become so morally corrupt that such a case as the one in the link above can even exist, we become despised and make enemies, not only abroad but within, as decent folks are pushed to extremes as an equal and opposite reaction to the societally destructive onslaught of liberal extremism.

I'm all for live and let live, but live and let breed is another issue that needs to be kept in check if it abuses children. LGBTs and those with hereditary diseases or disabilities have no moral right to procreate. We already have enough disadvantaged children struggling for survival or dependent on the nanny state so by allowing the seriously-genetically flawed to produce offspring, we are deliberately bringing children into a life of suffering and creating a sicker society.

The consensus of scientific opinion on the cause of LGBT is an abnormality occurring in the womb and not a lifestyle choice as is so often proclaimed; the gay rights group Stonewall accepts this official explanation and rightly uses it as an argument against homophobia; nobody should be persecuted for an accident of birth. However, LGBTs should recognise their defect and accept they aren't suitable for parenthood.

Children are born innocent and their early years are dependent on whomever takes care of them; being adopted or born by LGBTs is psychologically damaging for their malleable and impressionable young minds. Such cases as the story in the link below are so abhorrent that heads should roll.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2043345/The-California-boy-11-undergoing-hormone-blocking-treatment.html

That story tells of such wicked child abuse that the only the death penalty would suffice. Sadly, the "parents" and their partners in crimes against humanity are apparently within their rights; rights which should not exist; rights which give them the privilege of committing the inhumane and criminal act of child abuse without recourse.

Various LGBT groups have been vying for rights and promoting their agendas so aggressively that many have been taken in by the propaganda, and the silent majority has been duped into giving them not just equality but privilege. Like with so many rights groups, they package privilege as progress and equality, initially demonising voices of reason as bigots but ultimately lobbying government to criminalise criticism, then true human rights are denied such as freedom of speech; debate is shutdown and we become subject to authoritarianism and oppression, which foments resentment, hatred and extremism; the very reasons rights groups formed to lobby against.