This is a typical perception of this issue and is a comment I've copied from elsewhere:
"A child's privacy is normally the reason there is 'secrecy' in court proceedings that involve them, much like sealing a youth's criminal record. I suppose we should blast all their family, private, and perhaps painful information all over the internet to prove a point? Children always come last in all these scenarios of male equality. They aren't even considered."
Nobody wants to publish family secrets or compromise personal privacy. The main issue has been family court officials discussing cases without one or both sides involved, which is a shocking breach of human rights and simply unethical.
Of course, the best interests of children should be prioritized in custody cases but that is largely subjective because we're dealing with human emotions, which are rather amplified in acrimonious divorce cases.
At some point in the last century, feminism successfully lobbied for women's emotions to be enshrined in law, and until those laws are repealed, injustice and misandry will prevail, and ultimately the collapse of civilization.
